Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12207 (DEL)

RAJA DEEPAK MADAN v. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS.

W.P.(C)/9572/2026 · 2026-07-17

Amit Bansal

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(C) 9572/2026 $~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9572/2026 & CM APPL. 44629/2026, CM APPL. 44630/2026 RAJA DEEPAK MADAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vineet Bhagat (through VC) and Ms. Aryaa Nagpal, Advocates. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum and Mr. Ayush Gandhi, Advocates for NDMC. Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Mr. Vedansh Vashisht and Mr. Swapan Singhal, Advocates for R-2 to R-4. Mr. Akhil Sachar, Mr. Shantanu Agarwal, Mr. Manas Arora, Mr. Abhinav Tyagi and Mr. Raghav Thareja, Advocates for R-5 and R-6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 17.07.2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/07/2026 at 11:44:38 W.P.(C) 9572/2026 2. Earlier, the petitioner had filed a writ petition, being W.P. (C) 14043/2025, which was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 11th September, 2026, directing the respondent/NDMC to decide the representation of the petitioner with regard to grant of sanction of additional FAR in respect of the property in question. 3. Ms. Zubeda Begum, counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.1/NDMC, on instructions, submits as follows: i. The aforesaid representation of the petitioner stands decided. Therefore, prayer (a) stands satisfied. ii. Insofar as relief (c) is concerned, individual flat owners had approached the appellate authority with regard to unauthorised encroachments and temporary structures, and the appellate authority has passed appropriate orders in respect of the same. 4. Counsel for the respondents no.2 to 4 and the respondents no.5 to 6 submit that the issue with regard to title, possession and mutation of the flats in White House Apartments is pending adjudication in various suits before This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/07/2026 at 11:44:38 W.P.(C) 9572/2026 this Court. Therefore, the direction sought in prayer (b) cannot be granted at this stage. 5. Mr. Sameer Vashisht, counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents no.2 to 4, submits that the petitioner himself has filed various suits in relation to the different flats being CS No.565/2025, CS No.566/2025, CS No.05/2026, CS No.485/2025, CS No.491/2025, CS No.487/2025, CS No.489/2025, CS No.635/2025 and CS No.511/2025 which are pending before the District Courts, Patiala House. 6. In the opinion of this Court, the issues raised by the petitioner cannot be taken up in the present writ petition as these are disputed questions of fact which are pending adjudication before the Civil Court. In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present writ petition. 7. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed. AMIT BANSAL, J JULY 17, 2026 Vivek/- This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/07/2026 at 11:44:38