Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12206 (BOM)

NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. NIETU RAMSAMBHAR SHUKLA AND ANR.

FA/752/2025 · 2026-09-28

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

64-FA-752-2025.doc vaishnavi IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 752 OF 2025 New India Insurance Co. Ltd. ...Appellant V/s. Nietu Ramsambhar Shukla and Anr. ...Respondents Ms. Swati Sinha, for the Applicant/Appellant. Mr. Faizan Shaikh, for Respondent No. 1. CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR , J. DATE : 28 th SEPTEMBER , 2026. P.C. :- 1. The learned counsel for appellant as well as original claimants submit that the parties have compromised the matter and they have also executed consent terms which are signed by the parties and their respective lawyers. 2. It is pointed out that the respondent no. 1 is personally present. The original document of consent terms has been tendered across the bar and the same is taken on record and 1/2 64-FA-752-2025.doc marked as document ‘X’ for identification purposes. 3. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably settled the dispute in terms of compromise, the instant appeal is disposed of in view of the consent terms. The undertakings mentioned in the consent terms be treated as undertaken given to the court. The parties are directed to act in accordance with the consent terms. 4. The amount of statutory deposit along with accrued interest be transferred to M.A.C.T Mumbai and the appellant is entitled to withdraw the said amount. The appellant is also entitled for refund of court fees as per rules. 5. Pending applications stands disposed of. (PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) 2/2