Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:15052
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 72 of 2026
Baijun Baski
….. Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Shri Manish Kumar, Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Magistrate, Pakur
….. Opposite Parties
-----
CORAM
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
----- For the Petitioner: Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate For O.P.No.2:
Mr. Mukul Kr. Singh, A.C to G.P-III
-----
07/15.05.2026 The present contempt application has been filed against the O.P.No.2 alleging wilful disobedience and non-compliance of the order dated 03.07.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 1705/2023.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, submits that pursuant to the aforesaid order of this Court, the petitioner’s representation has been considered and rejected by the O.P.No.2. He however submits that since the representation has erroneously been rejected by the O.P.No.2, the petitioner may be given liberty to take appropriate recourse against the said order.
3. Considering the said submission, there is no need to further proceed with the matter.
4. The contempt proceeding as against the O.P.No.2 is dropped.
5. The present contempt application stands disposed of.
6. The petitioner is however at liberty to take appropriate recourse as permissible under law for redressal of his subsisting grievance, if any.
Satish/-
(RAJESH SHANKAR, J)