Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010124792026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2655/2026 in WP(C)/3486/2026 MS MASUD ENTERPRISE AND TRAVELS REPRESENTED BY ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR MASUD RAIHAN SIDDIK VILLAGE BALIDUNGA P.O. P.S. BHURAGAON DISTRICT MORIGAON ASSAM PIN 782121. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI 110001. 2:THE BRANCH MANAGER INDUSIND BANK HIBARGAON NAGAON BRANCH P.O. NAGAON SADAR DISTRICT NAGAON ASSAM PIN 782001 3:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CYBER CRIME ASSAM CID HEADQUARTERS ULUBARI GUWAHATI 781007 ASSAM. Page No.# 2/3 4:THE NODAL OFFICER NATIONAL CYBER CRIME REPORTING PORTAL NCRP MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NEW DELHI 110001. 5:THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE GREATER CHENNAI POLICE CHENNAI SOUTH CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION CHENNAI 600007 TAMIL NADU ------------ Advocate for : MR N ZAMAN Advocate for : DY.S.G.I. appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER 12-08-20 26 Heard Mr. N. Zaman, learned counsel for the applicant; and Mr. J. K. Goswami, learned Central Government Counsel, for the opposite parties No. 1, 5 and 6 as well as Ms. M. Barman, learned Government Advocate, Assam for the opposite party No.4. 2. This interlocutory application is preferred by the applicant, who has preferred the accompanying writ petition, WP(C) No. 3486/2026, seeking amendment in the Cause-Title of the accompanying writ petition. 3. It is averred that while filing the writ petition, the opposite parties/respondents were inadvertently numbered as respondent Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6 in the Cause Title. It is stated that due to inadvertent typographical and clerical mistakes, serial number “2” was omitted in the Cause-Title. As a result, there is no respondent No. 2 in the accompanying writ petition, although there are Page No.# 3/3 5 (five) respondents. 4. Having regard to the statements and averments made in this interlocutory application and considering the fact that the mistakes in the Cause-Title of the accompanying writ petition appear to be typographical one, the instant interlocutory application stands allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant