Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1220 (ALL)

DHANPRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

CRLP/6469/2026 · 2026-04-19

Rajeev Misra, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6469 of 2026 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Case called out in revised list. 2. Even though the names of Mr. Krishna Kumar Patel and Mr. Sangam Lal Kesharwani, Advocates are duly published in the cause list as counsel for petitioner but neither they nor any one on their behalf are present to press present writ petition. 3. Learned A.G.A. for State-respondents 1, 2 and 3 is present. 4. As no one appears on behalf of petitioner to press this writ petition even in revised call, it is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. April 20, 2026 Imtiyaz Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Kumar Patel, Sangam Lal Kesharwani Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Dhanprasad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- IMTIYAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- IMTIYAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad