Supplementary-1, Sl. No. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(WA) No. 12 of 2026 1. The State of Manipur represented by the Secretary/Commissioner (Works), Government of Manipur, Old Secretariat, South Block, Imphal, Manipur -795001. 2. The Chief Engineer, PWD, Govt. of Manipur at Imphal. 3. The Commissioner/Secretary (Finance), Government of Manipur, Old Secretariat, South Block, Imphal, Manipur- 795001. 4. The Joint Secretary (Pension Cell), Govt. of Manipur. ……Appellants/Applicants -Versus- 1. Chinganbam Dilip Meitei, aged about 48 years, S/o (L) Ch. Ibocha Singh, Ex-Work charged Chowkidar, Mechanical Division No. 1, PWD, Manipur and a resident of Khurai Kongpal Chingabam Leikai, P.O. & P.S. Porompat, Imphal East District, Manipur. ….. Respondent 2. The Accountant General, Manipur at Imphal. ….. Proforma Respondent BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M. SUNDAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA For the Appellants :: Mr. S. Niranjan, Government Advocate For the Respondents :: Ms. Kh. Sapna, Advocate for respondent No. 1 (Physical Court) led by Mr. N. Umakanta, senior advocate on the Video Conferencing (V.C.) platform; Mr. S. Suresh, Advocate for respondent No. 2. SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL SHARMA Digitally signed by SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL SHARMA Date: 2026.03.27 19:59:17 +05'30' Date of Hearing :: 27.03.2026 Date of Order :: 27.03.2026 ORDER (M. Sundar, CJ) [1] After some arguments, Mr. S. Niranjan, learned State Counsel sought leave of this Court to withdraw the captioned ‘Miscellaneous Case’ (‘MC’ for the sake of brevity) and he made a further plea to preserve all the rights and contentions of the ‘applicants’ (‘State’ collectively for the sake of convenience) to file another MC application with ‘Condonation of Delay’ (‘CoD’) prayer qua the same subject matter. To be noted, when the matter was taken up, it came to light that more than one phase in the 634 (six hundred thirty-four) days sought to be condoned remain unexplained and this necessitated the request of learned State Counsel. In this view of the matter, the request of learned State Counsel is acceded to. [2] In this regard, the endorsement made by the learned State Counsel in the case file (scanned reproduction) is as follows : [3] In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned MC is disposed of as withdrawn/closed albeit with preservation of rights and contentions of applicants/State as set out supra. [4] We refrain from imposing costs. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE FR/NFR Sushil P.S. I : Upload forthwith P.S. II : All concerned will stand bound by web copy uploaded in High Court website inter-alia as the same is QR coded.