Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010198292024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case : I.A.(Civil)/2811/2026 SMTI LALROSARI NAMPUI AND ORS C/O V. L. ROHNUNA PARATE R/O ELECTRIC VENG HAFLONG DIMA HASAO ASSAM 788819. 2: SMTI DURGA THAPA D/O HARKA BAHADUR THAPA R/O GURUNANAK MARKET A. T. ROAD BELOW SBI HIJUGURI DHEKIAJURI GAON TINSUKIA ASSAM 786192. 3: SMTI SIMA RANI DAS D/O KIRON CHANDRA DAS R/O KAYANG DESWALI DITTOKCHERRA P.O. HARANGAJAO DIMA HASAO ASSAM 788818 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006. 2:THE NORTH CACHAR HILLS AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY Page No.# 2/3 HAFLONG DISTRICT DIMA HASAO ASSAM 788819. 3:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY N NORTH CACHAR HILLS AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL HAFLONG PRIMARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT DISTRICT DIMA HASAO ASSAM 788819. 4:THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR EDUCATION HILLS ASSAM HAFLONG DISTRICT DIMA HASAO ASSAM 788819. 5:THE DISTRICT PRIMARY EDUCATION OFFICER NORTH CACHAR HILLS AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL HAFLONG DISTRICT DIMA HASAO ASSAM 788819. ------------ Advocate for : MR. B BARUAH Advocate for : SC ELEM. EDU appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 20-08-2026 Heard Mr. B. Baruah, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Mr. C. Sarma, learned standing counsel, NC Hills (Education) Department, appearing for the respondents. The present interlocutory application has been instituted by the applicants praying for deletion of the names of petitioner Nos. 3, 4 and 10 in the connected writ petition Page No.# 3/3 being W.P.(C) No. 4900/2024. This Court has perused the contentions raised in the present interlocutory application and finds that the deletion is prayed on account of personal reasons of the said petitioners. The prayer made by the applicant in the present matter is not objected to by Mr. C. Sarma, learned standing counsel, NC Hills (Education). In view of the above position, the prayer made in the interlocutory application for deletion of the names of the petitioner Nos. 3, 4 and 10 in the connected writ petition being W.P.(C) No. 4900/2024 stands allowed. The names of the petitioner Nos. 3, 4 and 10 be deleted from the array of petitioners in the said writ petition. With the above observations and directions the present interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant