Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12199 (AP)

VASANTHA & 5 ORS v. M.SUNDARAM & ANR

MACMA/1303/2011 · 2026-09-27

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010287882011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE 28th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1303/2011 Between: 1. VASANTHA & 5 ORS, W/O LATE CHINNARAJULU R/O CHITTAPARA VILLAGE AND POST, GUDIPALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. MANJULA, D/O LATE CHINNARAJULU R/O CHITTAPARA VILLAGE AND POST, GUDIPALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. JAYANTHI, D/O LATE CHINNARAJULU R/O CHITTAPARA VILLAGE AND POST, GUDIPALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. LATHA, D/O LATE CHINNARAJULU R/O CHITTAPARA VILLAGE AND POST, GUDIPALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. VALARAMATHI, D/O LATE CHINNARAJULU MINOR, R/O CHITTAPARA VILLAGE AND POST, GUDIPALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. JAYAMALI, D/O LATE CHINNARAJULU MINOR, APPE. 5 AND 6 ARE REP.BY THEIR MOTHER SMT. VASANTHA R/O CHITTAPARA VILLAGE AND POST, GUDIPALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. M SUNDARAM ANR, S/O NOT KNOWN R/O 20-30-7, HASSAN KHANA STREET, CHITTOOR. 2. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, REP.BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, VELLORE BRANCH, JAMBU BALA COMPLEX, - 29/B, ARCOT ROAD, 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC before the High CourtBeing aggrieved by the award and decree dated 17.08.1999 in M.V.O.P. No. 391 of 1994 on the file of the First Additional District Judge cum-Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chittoor, insofar as the Hon'ble Tribunal had not awarded in full the sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- claimed by the appellants herein, the appellants present this Memorandum of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal to this Hon'ble Court for the following, among other grounds IA NO: 1 OF 2003(CMP 9700 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 1248 days in filing the above CMA Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. G MANOHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. RAVI SHANKAR JANDHYALA 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1303 OF 2011 JUDGEMENT: [ Despite the matter being listed under the caption “for dismissal for non prosecution” today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. The proceeding sheet dated 25.09.2026 would also show that there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. 2. Sri N.Rama Krishna, learned Standing Counsel representing the respondent No.2/Insurance Company is in attendance. 3. In that view of the matter, the Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 28.09.2026 UPS 4 15 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1303 OF 2011 Dt.28.09.2026 UPS