Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12198 (KAR)

SMT. NARAYANAMMA, v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,

WP/36260/2025 · 2026-03-10

R Devdas

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14298 WP No. 36260 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 36260 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. NARAYANAMMA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS DAUGHTER OF LATE SHRI. NAGAPPA. 2. ANNAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS S/O LATE SHRI. GIRIYAPPA. BOTH ARE R/AT BHAKTHAGONDARAHALLI VILLAGE, JADIGENAHALLI HOBLI HOSAKOTE TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI D. GANGADHARA, ADV.) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPTD. BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VEEDHANA VEEDHI M.S. BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT DEVANAHALLI DODDABALLAPURA ROAD DODDABALLAPURA - 561 203. 3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER FOR INAAM ABOLITION KOLAR CIRCLE, KOLAR - 561 203. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14298 WP No. 36260 of 2025 DODDABALLAPURA. 5. THE THASILDAR HOSAKOTE TALUK HOSAKOTE - 562 114 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 6. SRI NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS S/O LATE PILLAMREGOWDA @ PILLAMARAPPA. 7. SHRI. RAMESHA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS S/O NARAYANAPPA. 8. SHRI. SONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS S/O LATE PILLAMAREGOWDA @ PILLAMARAPPA. 9. SHRI. KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS S/O LATE PILLAMAREGOWDA @ PILLAMARAPPA. 10. SHRI. KARIYAPPA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS SHRI. ANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS S/O LATE SRI KARIYAPPA. 11. SHRI. PILLAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS S/O LATE SHRI. KARIYAPPA. RESPONDENTS 5 TO 10 ARE R/AT KARIBEERANA HOSAHALLI VILLAGE JADIGENAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R1 TO R5) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14298 WP No. 36260 of 2025 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF ENDORSEMENT DATED 07/03/1962 PASSED IN CASE NO.3954/1961-62 (ANNEXURE-C), AND FURTHER THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 19/03/1962 (ANNEXURE-D) ISSUED BY THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KOLAR, AS ILLEGAL AND VOID. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 06.03.2026 stating that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute the writ petition and therefore, the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition as not pressed. 2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE RB