(2026:JHHC:14965) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 4153 of 2026 Warish @ Pathan @ Waris Khan @ Warish Khan, aged about 20 years, son of Parwej Khan, residence of Jamun Toli, PO & PS – Ratu, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … …Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … …Opp. Party ------ For the Petitioner : Md. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the State : Mr. Praful Jojo, Addl. P.P. ------ HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ Order No:- 02, Dated:- 14th May, 2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Sukhdeonagar (Pandra O.P.) P.S. Case No.23 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 61(2), 318(4), 109(1), 118(2), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 along with Section 27 of the Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons and in criminal conspiracy with them attempted to murder the informant by firing upon him and the bullet hit the right arm of the informant and his brother Vikash Singh. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the genesis of the occurrence is related to land dealing of 36 decimals of land in which the informant on the instruction of co-accused-Sanjay Pandey invested Rs.58,00,000/- to be paid to the land owners and after expiry of one and half years neither the sale deed in respect of the said land was executed in favour of the informant nor the money was refunded. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.23 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 09.04.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 25 of the bail application and the main allegation is against the co-accused Sanjay Pandey. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person with similar allegation has already been admitted to bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 17.03.2026 in B.A. No.2068 of 2026. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M., Ranchi, in connection with Sukhdeonagar (Pandra O.P.) P.S. Case No. 23 of 2026, with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated – 14.05.2026 Aditi