Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1219 (JHR)

MUNNA THAKUR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./645/2026 · 2026-02-09

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:3372 --1-- A.B.A. No. 645 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 645 of 2026 ---- 1. Munna Thakur, aged about 35 years, son of Sukhdev Thakur, resident of Baramasia, PO and PS – Baramasia, District – Dhanbad 2. Raj Kumar Saw, aged about 38 years, son of Arjun Saw, resident of Shahjanand Nagar (Shankar Nagar), PO and PS – Baramasia, District - Dhanbad .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Suraj Singh, Advocate :- Mr. Sunil Singh, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Sanat Kumar Jha, Advocate ---- 03/09.02.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Dhansar P.S. Case No.186 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 118(2), 109(1), 308(3), 351(2) and 352 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of Arms Act pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhanbad. 3. At the request of learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, supplementary affidavit of the petitioners is taken on record. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that there are case and counter case between the parties. He further submits that in the FIR there are 10 named accused persons and 100 unknown. He then submits that both the sides have received the injury. He next 2026:JHHC:3372 --2-- A.B.A. No. 645 of 2026 submits that it is not clear from whose blow such injury has been received by one Uday Pratap Singh. He also submits that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.12 of the petition. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegation of assault is there and injury has also been received on the body of Uday Pratap Singh. 6. Considering that there are case and counter case between the parties and the allegations are made against 10 named accused persons and 100 unknown and there are general and omnibus allegation of assault against all the accused persons and the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.12 of the petition, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhanbad in connection with Dhansar P.S. Case No.186 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 09.02.2026 Sangam/