APHC010115202025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 8473 OF 2025 Between: 1. ETTAMSETTI MAHALAKSHMI, S/o Appala Naidu, Hindu, aged about 60 years, cultivation, r/at Mulagapudi Bennavaram village, Natahvaram mandal, Anakapalli district. ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, rep. by its Principle Secretary, Revenue Department, 4th Block, Ground Floor, Room No 135, A.P Secretariat Office, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur Dist, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The District Collector, Anakapalli, Anakapalle District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Narsipatnam, Anakapalle District, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Tahsildar, Natahvaram, Natahvaram mandal, Ankapalle District, Andhra Pradesh. 5. The Station House Officer, Nathavaram Police Station, Natahvaram mandal, Ankapalle District, Andhra Pradesh. 6. Bheemavarapu Dhanaraju, S/o Late Nooka Raju, Hindu, aged about 40 years, cultivation, r/at Neelampeta village, Narsipatnam mandal, Anakapalli district. 2 7. Bheemavarapu Varaprasad, S/o Late Nooka Raju, Hindu, aged about 36 yeairs, cultivation, r/at Neelampeta village, Narsipatnam mandal, Anakapalli district. 8. Bheemavarapu Satyavathi, w/o Late Nooka Raju, Hindu, aged about 60 years, cultivation, r/at Neelampeta village, Narsipatnam mandal, Anakapalli district. 9. Ruthala Naga Satya Raja Surya Devullu, S/o Nageswara Rao, Hindu, aged about 39 years, cultivation, r/at Mulagapudi Bennavaram village, Natahvaram mandal, Anakapalli district. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent authorities in interfering with the peaceful possession of the petitioner and making efforts to dispossess the petitioner from her agricultural land situated in Survey No. 68/2 admeasuring to an extent of Ac.2.00 cents situated at Mulagapudi Village, Nathavaram Mandal, Ankapalle District, Andhra Pradesh at the instance of the unofficial respondents without following procedure established by the law as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and the act of authorities is against the principle laid down by the Honourable Apex court in the case of Rame Gowda V/S M Varadappa Naidu Citation 2003 LawSuit(SC) 1248 and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere into the peaceful possession of the subject property situated at Survey No. 68/2 admeasuring to an extent of Ac.2.00 cents situated at Mulagapudi Village, Nathavaram Mandal, Ankapalle District, Andhra Pradesh except by following due process of law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 3 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere over the land situated at Survey No. 68/2 admeasuring to an extent of Ac.2.00 cents situated at Mulagapudi Village, Nathavaram Mandal, Ankapalle District, Andhra Pradesh except by due process of law and pass order or orders in accordance with law, pending disposal of the writ petition may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to make any mutations over the land situated at Survey No. 68/2 admeasuring to an extent of Ac.2.00 cents situated at Mulagapudi Village, Nathavaram Mandal, Ankapalle District, Andhra Pradesh without following the procedure established by the law in view of the Judgment Chinnam Panduranga V Mandal Revenue Officer, 2007, Law Suit (AP) 293 and pass order or orders in accordance with law, pending disposal of the writ petition may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: P NANILU NAIDU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 8473 OF 2025 1. In view of the court slip moved by the learned counsel for the petitioner on 29.09.2026, the matter is directed to be posted today under the caption ‘for withdrawal’. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents furnished written instructions dated 17.09.2026, wherein, the amount to be payable by the petitioner was determined. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the petitioner is ready to pay the amount as determined by the respondents vide proceedings dated 17.09.2026 and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 4. Permission as sought for is accorded. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 30.09.2026 BSP/DS 5 30 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 8473 OF 2025 Dated:30.09.2026 BSP/DS