Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12186 (ALL)

RAJENDRA SINGH v. M. ARUN MOLI

CAPL/6283/2026 · 2026-10-07

Piyush Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6283 of 2026 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. In pursuance of the earlier order passed by this Court, learned Standing Counsel, has obtained instruction, which is taken on record. Placing reliance upon the aforesaid instruction, learned Standing Counsel submits that the order passed by the writ Court has been duly complied with in its letter and spirit and an order in this respect has already been passed on 3.10.2026, a copy of which has been handed over to the counsel for the applicant in the Court, itself. In view of the aforesaid position, nothing further survives for consideration in the present contempt proceedings. Consequently, no cause of action survives. Accordingly, the contempt application stands disposed of. The contempt application shall be consigned to the records. The notice, if any, stands discharged. However, liberty is granted to the applicant(s) to approach this Court by moving an appropriate application, in the event of non-compliance of the order by the opposite party(s) within a period of one month from today. October 8, 2026 Rahul Dwivedi/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajendra Prasad Pandey, Rakesh Kumar Pandey, Shyam Surat Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Piyush Agrawal,J.) Rajendra Singh .....Applicant(s) M. Arun Moli .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad