Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12185 (JHR)

NAZIR ANSARI @ LADEN v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4247/2026 · 2026-05-15

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:15055 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4247 of 2026 Nazir Ansari @ Laden, Son of Zakir Ansari … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate Mr. Bhaswat Prakash, Advocate For the Opp. Party : None --- 04/15th May 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Dumka (M) P.S. Case No. 82/2024 corresponding to Special POCSO Case No. 45/2024 for the offence registered under Section 96 of BNS and subsequently charge has been framed for offence under Section 96 of BNS and Section 12 of POCSO Act, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Special Judge, POCSO Act, Dumka. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the victim was found missing from home. It was alleged that she was eloped with the petitioner and the case was instituted. He submits that the victim has been examined before the Court and she has not supported the prosecution case at all. Rather, she has stated that she had left her house in anger and had gone to Kuchbihar and she did not meet the petitioner at that place and that the petitioner is totally innocent. The petitioner is in custody since 08.08.2024. 3. Nobody appears on behalf of the opposite party. 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and upon going through the deposition of the victim and considering the custody of the petitioner since 08.08.2024, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) 2026:JHHC:15055 2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, POCSO Act, Dumka in connection with Dumka (M) P.S. Case No. 82/2024, subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 5. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 6. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 15.05.2026 Uploaded On: 15.05.2026 Mukul/-