- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8338 WP No. 6235 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 6235 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: MR. ABDUL KAREEM S/O MOHAMMED HABEEBULLA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS R/AT NO.38/2, SULTANJI GUNTA ROAD OPPOSITE MADINA MASJID SHIVAJINAGAR, BANGALORE – 560 051. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A KUMARAVEL, ADVOCATE) AND: THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER SHRIRAM HOUSING FINANCE REG OFFICE NO.123 ANGAPPA NAICKEN STREET Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8338 WP No. 6235 of 2024 CHENNAI – 600 001. BRANCH OFFICE AT NO.96 R.B. MANOR, 20TH MAIN ROAD, 2ND BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR BENGALURU – 560 010. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K.V. LOKESH, ADVOCATE FOR C/R) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE POSSESSION NOTICE DTD. 28.11.2023 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT WHICH IS PRODUCED AS PER ANNX-C AS THE SAME IS ATONCE ILLEGAL AND UNLAWFUL AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: *** - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8338 WP No. 6235 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER The petitioner filed this writ petition seeking for quashing the possession notice dated 28.11.2023 issued by the respondent vide Annexure-C and also seeking direction to the respondent to reschedule and regularise the loan account, and to direct the respondent to handover the possession of the schedule property to the petitioner forthwith, since the possession of the schedule property is taken in violation of principles of natural justice. 2. The writ petition was filed on 13.02.2024. Despite granting of sufficient opportunity, the petitioner has not complied with the office objections. 3. Today, the case is posted for compliance of office objections for 7th time. The petitioner has challenged the possession notice dated 28.11.2023. The petitioner has an equal efficacious remedy. The petitioner without - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8338 WP No. 6235 of 2024 exhausting equal efficacious remedy, filed this writ petition. Hence, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is not maintainable. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. 4. A liberty is reserved to the petitioner to challenge the possession notice, if so advised. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed off accordingly. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SSB