17-WP4408-2026.DOC Santosh IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4408 OF 2026 Rajkumar Shrinath Chaursiya ...Petitioner Versus Grievance Redressal Committee And Ors. …Respondents Mr. Vinod Panday, through VC, for the Petitioner. Ms. Rita Joshi, AGP for the State. Mr. Abhijit Aher, i/b Tanaya Goswami, for Respondent No.3. CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED: 28th SEPTEMBER, 2026 PC:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. There is no substance in the petition as the challenge to the certification of the name of respondent No.5 Dineshkumar Shrinath Chaursiya in Annexure-II was raised by the petitioner after a period of 16 years. Both the authorities have justifiably declined to entertain such belated petition. 3. This Court, in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction, does not find any justifiable reason to entertain the petition. 4. The petition stands dismissed. 5. The petitioner is at liberty to avail the remedies as available in law. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 1/1 SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2026.09.29 14:57:06 +0530