- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11688 MFA No. 1235 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.1235 OF 2017 (CPC) BETWEEN: N RAVINDRANATH KAMATH S/O LATE N VENKATESH KAMATH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS ADVOCATE BY PROFESSION SHEVGOOR & KAMATH LAW ASSOCIATES 201, HVS COURT, 21, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BANGALORE-560052. …APPELLANT (BY SMT. NAVYA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SIDDAMALLAPPA P.M., ADVOCATE) AND: B V SHETTY S/O LATE C S SHETTY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS A1, CASA LEVELLEE LAVELLEE ROAD BANGALORE-560001. …RESPONDENT THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(c) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11688 MFA No. 1235 of 2017 ORAL JUDGMENT Smt.Navya, counsel on behalf of Sri.Siddamallappa P.M., for the appellant appeared in person and seeks time to comply with the office objections. 2. This Court is not inclined to grant time. The reason is simple. The appeal is listed today for orders regarding non - compliance with the office objections. A perusal of the appeal papers reflects that the appeal is filed in 2017. We have almost completed two months in 2026. So far, the office objections are not complied with. The Court had issued notice on 19.11.2024. It is almost two years, the needful has not been done. It appears, that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance with the office objections. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13