Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12177 (GAU)

ABDUL OHAB @ ABDUL WAHAB v. UDDAB CH KALITA (KALU) AND 4 ORS.

I.A.(Civil)/2413/2026 · 2026-08-20

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010098952026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2413/2026 ABDUL OHAB @ ABDUL WAHAB S/O LATE HESABUDDIN, R/O VILL- KOREYA PART-I, P.O.- KOREYA, P.S.- JOGIGHOPA, DIST- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 783388 VERSUS UDDAB CH KALITA (KALU) AND 4 ORS. S/O LATE KANAK KALITA, R/O VILL- KAYAPOTTI (JOGIGHOPA), P.O. AND P.S.- JOGIGHOPA, DIST- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 783382 2:PRAKASH CH. KALITA S/O LATE KANAK KALITA R/O VILL- KAYAPOTTI (JOGIGHOPA) P.O. AND P.S.- JOGIGHOPA DIST- BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 783382 3:SMTI HIMANGINI KALITA (RUMA) D/O LATE KANAK KALITA W/O SRI SABIN DAS R/O VILL- KABAITARY NEAR POLICE STATION P.O.- KABAITARY P.S.- JOGIGHOPA DIST- BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 783382 4:SMTI. BIVA KALITA D/O LATE KANAK KALITA W/O SRI HEM KISHOR MAZUMDAR R/O VILL- KASHARPARA Page No.# 2/2 P.O.- BOITAMARY P.S.- ABHAYAPURI DIST- BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 783389 5:PADYUT DAS (PADDU) S/O LATE ROTI KANTA DAS R/O VILL- SEDAMMARI (ASHOK PAPER MILL) P.O.- ASHOK PAPER MILL P.S.- JOGIGHOPA DIST- BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 78338 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. R CHOUDHURY, MR. Z. HUSSAIN,MS. B. HAZARIKA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. B J MUKHERJEE (FOR CAVEATOR), MS R SAHA (FOR CAVEATOR) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 21.08.2026 Heard Ms. B. Hazarika, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Ms. R. Saha, learned counsel appearing for the respondent/caveator. This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying for condonation of delay of 18 days in filing the connected appeal. The delay has been satisfactorily explained. This court is of the opinion that going for issuing notice on the respondents would be nothing but sheer waste of time. Therefore, the delay is condoned. Registry is directed to register and list he connected appeal for admission hearing. The interlocutory application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant