Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12175 (JHR)

KUNDAN DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3061/2026 · 2026-05-13

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:14629 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3061 of 2026 Kundan Das, son of Shambhu Das … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl. P.P. --- 04/13.05.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 11.01.2026 in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 06 of 2026, registered under Sections 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of the Information Technology Act, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that one mobile phone and one SIM card is alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and as per the opposite party, one victim has been identified. He has further submitted that the mobile and SIM card which have been recovered from the petitioner, do not link with the alleged victim. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 11.01.2026 and charge-sheet has already been submitted. He submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer. However, the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner could not be disputed. 6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to 2026:JHHC:14629 2 be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 06 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 7. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. 8. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:13.05.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:14.05.2026