Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12172 (JHR)

ANKIT KUMAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3514/2026 · 2026-05-14

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:14979] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3514 of 2026 1. Ankit Kumar, Aged About 20 Years, Son of-Ashok Kumar 2. Vicky Kumar, Aged About- 18 Years, Son of-Mahendra Prasad Both Resident of Village Koriyadih, P.O.- Barsot & P.S. Barhi, District- Hazaribag. … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioners : Mr. Arpit Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha, Addl.. PP 03 / 14.05.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Korrah P.S. Case No. 184/2025, registered under section 310(2) of BNS, 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners and the co-accused persons committed robbery by snatching the gold chain, ring, cash of Rs.90,000/-, two mobile phones of the informant and eight mobile phones from the friend of the informant at gun point. It is next submitted that without putting the petitioners on TIP, as mentioned in para 6 of the supplementary affidavit filed in this Bail Application, charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioners. It is next submitted that the petitioners have been in jail custody since 20.01.2026 as mentioned in para 13 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioners are ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertake not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case. It is next submitted that the co-accused with similar allegations has already been admitted to bail by this court vide order dated 25.03.2026 in B.A. No. 1584 of 2026, hence, the petitioners may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioners on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioners on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Hazaribag in connection with Korrah P.S. Case No. 184/2025, with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 14.05.2026 Smita/-