Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12170 (ALL)

OMKAR YADAV @ RAJVEER SINGH v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/34277/2026 · 2026-10-04

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34277 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sr. No.129 of 278) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Lokesh Ahlawat holding brief of Sri Munesh Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri R.P. Patel, learned State Law Officer for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.124 of 2026, under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336 (3), 340(2), 3(5), 61(2) B.N.S. and under Section 66-C, 66-D I.T. Act, Police Station Barra, District Kanpur Nagar, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant is not named in the F.I.R. but his name has subsequently been added in the statement of one of the victims and the said statement has been made as an afterthought. There is no previous criminal history and other three other cases has been foisted on him at a go. The applicant is in jail since 22.07.2026. He undertakes to cooperate with the trial and not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned State Law Officer has vehemently opposed the bail application but the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant could not be disputed. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Munesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Omkar Yadav @ Rajveer Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration that applicant is not named in the F.I.R. and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima-facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Omkar Yadav @ Rajveer Singh, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. October 5, 2026 Ashok Gupta BAIL No. 34277 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad