Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12166 (PNJ)

MUKESH KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/5090/2026 · 2026-04-06

Rupinderjit Chahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-5090 IN T 212 MUKESH KU STATE OF PU CORAM:- HO Present:- M for Mr *** RUPINDERJIT 1. Th Bharatiya Naga seek anticipator Sections 105 a Station Tibba, D 2. On the in 10 Sta 5090-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ AT CHANDIGAR CR Da H KUMAR Versus PUNJAB HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPIN Mr. Ankit Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Shukla, DAG, Punjab. ***** ERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) Through the instant petition file Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for cipatory bail in case FIR No.212 date 105 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Ny ibba, District Ludhiana. On 18.02.2026, the following order “Prayer in the present petit the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of ant in case FIR No.212 dated 12.12.2 105 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya N Station Tibba, District Ludhiana. PUNJAB & HARYANA IGARH CRM-M-5090-2026 Date of decision: 06.04.2026 ….Petitioner ....Respondent UPINDERJIT CHAHAL n filed under Section 482 of the 3 (for short “BNSS”), the petitioners 2 dated 12.12.2025 registered under iya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, at Police g order was passed by this Court: - petition filed under Section 482 of f anticipatory bail to the petitioner .12.2025 registered under Sections iya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, at Police oner dent f the ners nder olice of ner ons lice GURPREET 2026.04.07 12:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-5090 is t pet arg off pre cer Va ver of me tak friv no fro pet wh to an ag con he inv wh the ad sat sha 48 5090-2026 2 Status report filed by learne is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner has been falsely implic argued that the petitioner has no offence. He further argued that present at the spot of occurrenc certificate in this regard has als Varun Knitwears. He further arg verified by the investigating agenc of the status report. He further ar met the complainant as he did not taking Rs.5,000/- from the com frivolous. Moreover, the petitioner not involved in any other case and from him. Learned counsel has petitioner is ready and willing to when called upon to do so by the in On the other hand, learned to the status report, has oppos anticipatory bail, by submitting against the petitioner are serious i controverted the fact that the petiti he is not involved in any other case List on 05.03.2026. In the meantime, the pe investigation within a week from to when required by the Investigatin the Investigating Agency. In the admitted to interim bail on furnish satisfaction of Arresting/Investig shall also abide by the condition 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.” arned State counsel in Court today, the petitioner contends that the plicated in the present case. He s no connection with the alleged that the petitioner was not even rence and was at his job and a also issued by the proprietor of argued that the said fact is also gency and finds mention at para 8 r argued that the petitioner never not know him and the allegation of complainant is totally false and oner has clean antecedents as he is e and no recovery is to be effected has further submitted that the g to join the investigation as and he investigating agency. rned State counsel while referring pposed the prayer for grant of ting that the allegations levelled ous in nature. However, he has not petitioner is a first time offender as case. petitioner is directed to join m today and would appear as and gating Officer and cooperate with the event of arrest, he shall be rnishing of bail/surety bonds to the estigating Officer. The petitioner itions as envisaged under Section ay, the He ged ven a of lso a 8 ver of nd e is ted the nd ing of led not as oin nd ith be the ner ion GURPREET 2026.04.07 12:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-5090 3. Lea the order dated investigation. 4. Lea Singh, has subm longer required 5. In interim order d petitioner shall Investigating O Section 482(2) o 06.04.2026 Gurpreet 5090-2026 3 Learned counsel for the petitioner dated 18.02.2026 passed by this Cour tion. Learned counsel for the State, on s submitted that the petitioner has join quired for further investigation. In view of the statement made b rder dated 18.02.2026 passed by this shall continue to join investigation ting Officer and shall also abide by the 82(2) of the BNSS. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No tioner submits that in compliance of s Court, the petitioner has joined the te, on instructions from ASI Gurdial joined the investigation and is no ade by learned State counsel, the y this Court, is made absolute. The gation, as and when called by the by the conditions as provided under (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE es/No ce of d the rdial no , the The the nder AL) GURPREET 2026.04.07 12:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.