Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12166 (CHH)

LALIT KUMAR SAHU v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

WPS/3731/2026 · 2026-04-28

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2026:CGHC:19839 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3731 of 2026 • Lalit Kumar Sahu S/o Bhisham Singh Sahu Aged About 63 Years R/o House No. 6, Ward, No. 1, Jangalpur Distt. Rajnandgaon C.G. --- Petitioner(s) versus 1. Municipal Corporation, through Its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 2. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Rajnandgoan (C.G.) --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Ms. Bhavika Kotecha, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 29/04/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs. “10.1 This Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or of like nature of writ by directing the respondents to release all retiral dues including, provident fund, leave encashment etc. and other retiral dues with interest @ 12% per annum on the delayed payment in favour of the petitioner. 10.2 Any other relief, which is deemed fit and proper may also be awarded to the petitioner along with the cost of petition.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner stood retire from the post of Pump Attendant w.e.f. 28.02.2025, however, entire retiral dues has not been paid to petitioner even after lapse of about more PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA 2 / 2 than 01 year and therefore direction be issued to the respondents- Corporation to disburse entire retiral dues to petitioner forthwith. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that after receipt of advance copy of the petition, he has sought instructions from the concerned authorities. He submits that there is no dispute with regard to the entitlement of petitioner for retiral dues. He further submits that amount of retiral dues could not be disbursed on account of shortage of funds. However, on instructions, he submits that the retiral dues payable to petitioner will be cleared within a period of three months. 4. On due consideration of nature of grievance raised, submission made by learned counsel for respective parties, this writ petition at this stage is dispose off, directing Respondents to consider and take decision on the claim of petitioner and to disburse the retiral dues for which petitioner is entitled, in accordance with law, within a further period of 03 months from today. 5. It is for the counsel for respondents to inform the respondents about passing of order by this Court. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge pwn