- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14225 WP No. 2734 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 2734 OF 2026 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. HARSHAMANI S. RAI, W/O. SANTHOSH KUMAR RAI, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO. 303-2, KEMANJUR, ADYAR KATTE, MANGALURU, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 575 009. 2. SRI. SANTHOSH KUMAR RAI A.B., S/O. BALAKRISHNA RAI, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO. 303-2, KEMANJUR, ADYAR KATTE, MANGALURU, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 575 009. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. JITHIN JEIJO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE RECOVERY OFFICER AND ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, MANGALURU SUB-DIVISION, MANGALURU - 575 001. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14225 WP No. 2734 of 2026 2. SHRI SUBHRAMANYA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.. A CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY ACT, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT BEJAI, MANGALURU-575 004 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. SRI. SUDARSHAN S, S/O. SHANKARA AGED : MAJOR, R/AT D. NO. 1-1113, MUKRAMPADY HOUSE, KEMMINJE VILLAGE, DARBE POST, PUTTUR, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 202. 4. SRI. DHANUSH S. RAI, S/O. SANTHOSH KUMAR RAI, AGED : MAJOR, R/AT D. NO. 303-2, KEMANJUR, ADYARKATTE, ADYAR MANGALURU - 575 009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMMUNICATION DATED 04-01-2026 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.01 VIDE ANNEXURE-A. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14225 WP No. 2734 of 2026 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Petitioners in this petition has sought for quashing of the Communication dated 04.01.2026 (Annexure-A), which is a auction proceedings initiated by the respondent-authorities. Since, the petitioners have not assailed award passed by the competent authority, I am of the view that the relief sought for the petitioners cannot be accepted. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9