2026:JHHC:14713 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3251 of 2026 Gautam Das @ Goutam Das, son of Pancham Das … … Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Prabhu Dayal Agrawal, Spl. PP --- 04/13.05.2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 11.01.2026 in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No.06 of 2026, registered under Section 111 (2) (b), 111 (3), 111 (4), 319 (2), 318 (4), 338, 336 (3), 340 (2), 61 (2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and under Section 66B, 66C, 66D and 84 (C) of the Information Technology Act, 2008, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge – II, Deoghar. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 11.01.2026 and charge sheet has already been submitted. He further submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and one mobile and two sim cards alleged have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and one victim has been identified. 4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions are not in dispute. In addition, it has been submitted that there are 9 crime links found during investigation. 5. Considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and charge sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions 2026:JHHC:14713 2 Judge – II, Deoghar in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No.06 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:13.05.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:14.05.2026