K.A. Sudhakara Reddy S/o K. Anjina Reddy v. Andhra Pradesh Central Power
WP/6635/2013 · 2026-10-04
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12164 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12164 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010333002013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 5th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 6635 OF 2013 Between:
1. K.A. Sudhakara Reddy S/o K. Anjina Reddy,, Occu: Agriculture, R/o D.NO. 4-116, K. Basavanapalli village, H/o, Kirikera, Hindupur, Mantapur District. 2. M.A. Jabbar Baig S/o MA Khadar Baig,, Occ agriculture, R/o D. No. 26-4- 1065, Santhi Nagar, Hindupur, Anantapur District. 3. T. Nagaraju S/o Late T. Durgappa,, Occu: Agriculture, R/o D.No. 21-6-240, Housing Board colony, Hindupur, Anantapur District. ...Petitioners AND
1. Andhra Pradesh Central Power, Distribution Company Limited (APCPDCL) Rep by The Assistant Divisional Engineer, SVD Road, Hindupur, Anantapur District. ...Respondent Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declaring the action of the respondent in trying to give electrical connection and other amenities with respect to our lands in an extent of 3 acres 48 cents in survey No: 433-1, of Hindupur and consequently direct
2
the respondent not to grant electrical connections to third parties with respect to the said property IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 8304 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent not grant any electrical connections to the third parities with respect to the lands, in an extent of 3 acres 48 cents in survey No: 433-1, of Hindupur and pass such other order/orders pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 164912 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioners: R V NAGABUSHNAM RAO Counsel for the Respondent VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL The Court made the following order:
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 6635 OF 2013 ORDER:
Heard Sri Basha, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Basha, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is unable to get instructions from the petitioner whether the cause in the present writ petition survives or not. In view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioner requested to close the writ petition on the ground that the cause in the present writ petition does not survives for further adjudication and no further orders are necessary. 3. Considering the said submission, the present Writ Petition is closed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 05.10.2026 BSP/PVS
4
03 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 6635 OF 2013
05.10.2026 BSP/PVS