Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12162 (ALL)

MARWAN ANSARI v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WTAX/4088/2026 · 2026-10-06

Saumitra Dayal Singh, Swarupama Chaturvedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX No. - 4088 of 2026 Court No. - 39 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J. 1. Challenge has been raised to order dated 26.06.2026 involving demand of penalty. 2. At the outset, learned Standing Counsel objects that the order is appealable. 3. In view of the fact dispute involved, preliminary objection raised is sustained. 4. In so far as the petitioner may have just lost his remedy of appeal occasioned by lapse of limitation recently the writ petition is disposed of with the observation, subject to the petitioner filing appeal within a period of two weeks from today, same may be entertained and decided on merits, without raising any objection as to limitation. October 7, 2026 Shweta Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Alam, Parvez Ahmad Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) Marwan Ansari .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SWETA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad