Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12160 (HP)

PANKAJ THAKUR v. RAKESH KANWAR AND OTHERS

COPC/292/2026 · 2026-06-17

Sushil Kukreja

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 ( 2026:HHC:22854 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 292 of 2026 Decided on: 17.06.2026 ________________________________________________ Pankaj Thakur ....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Ors. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Jagmohan Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Compliance affidavit has been filed, wherein, it has been stated that in compliance to the directions passed by this Court, case of the petitioner has been considered and decided by the Deputy Director of School Education (Elementary) Kullu, District Kullu, H.P. vide Office Order dated 12.12.2025, copy whereof has been annexed with the compliance affidavit as Annexure R-3/1. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:22854 ) 2. Since judgment under reference stood duly complied with, therefore, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed. 3. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to assail Office Order dated 12.12.2025 in accordance with law. 4. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 17th June, 2026 Judge (raman)