Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12159 (ALL)

ASHOK KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/16573/2026 · 2026-10-06

Dinesh Pathak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16573 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to correct the details of the respondent no.2, during the course of the day. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record on Board. 3. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following reliefs:- "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent bank authorities to re-evaluate and re-fixe the petitioner's pension as he is having 26 years of service. ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent bank authorities to pay the pension up to day from entitlement of pension along with interest to the petitioner. iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent bank authorities to continue the payment of revised pension to the petitioner as and when it becomes due." 4. Shri Vivek Ratan Agrawal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has contended that the grievance of the petitioner regarding re- fixation of the pension, as raised in the instant writ petition, can be more appropriately redressed by the Assistant General Manager, Human Resource Department, Mumbai (respondent no.2) and that he has no objection if a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Farhana Khatoon, R.B. Pal, Umesh Kumar Pal Counsel for Respondent(s) : Vivek Ratan Agrawal Ashok Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) direction is issued for expeditious disposal of a fresh representation, to be moved by the present petitioner, within such stipulated period, as may be directed by this Court. 5. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Accordingly, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, with liberty to the present petitioner to move a fresh representation with respect to his grievances, as raised in this petition, within a period of three weeks from today, along with a certified copy of this order and a self attested copy of the instant writ petition before the respondent no.2, who, in turn, shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of the same. 6. With the aforesaid direction, instant writ petition stands finally disposed of. October 7, 2026 VR WRIA No. 16573 of 2026 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIBHA RATAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad