APHC010426692019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY, THE 29th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1306/2019 Between: 1. PRATTIPATI NARASIMHA RAJU, S/O. SALMON RAJU, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O. JANAKIRAMAIAH COLONY, RAMANNAPET ROAD, NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A. P, AMARAVATHI 2. BILLA SUBBA RAO, (DIED) 3. BILLA SAILAJA, D/O. LATE SUBBA RAO, W/O. AMARLAPUDI SRINIVAS RAO, AGED 38 YEARS, OCC TEACHER, R/O. 25-195, DURGA NAGAR, NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. TALARI PADMAJA, W/O. KRISHNA, D/O. LATE SUBBA RAO, AGED 37 YEARS, OCC TEACHER, R/O. GOLLAMUDI VILLAGE, NANDIGAMA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. BILLA SWARNA KUMARI, D/O. LATE SUBBA RAO, W/O. NELAKOTI BABU, AGED 36 YEARS, R/ O. HIG NO. 144, HOUSING BOARD COLONY, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. BILLA ANIL KUMAR, S/O. LATE SUBBA RAO. AGED 32 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, RIO. D.NO.25-195, DURGA NAGAR, NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KUMAR MARPU 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Petitioner and Respondent No.5 are present. On behalf of Respondent Nos.3, 4 & 6 Respondent No.5 has signed. Respondent Nos.3 to 6 are the legal heirs of Respondent No.2. Ms. Sudeepti Potluri, learned Counsel is appointed as learned Mediator in this case and has submitted mediator’s report. In view of the mediator’s report, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised. Consequently, the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Nandigama, in C.C.No.266 of 2016, dated 20.11.2017, as modified in Crl.A.No.455 of 2017, dated 13.12.2019, by the learned XVI Additional District & Sessions Judge, Nandigama, Krishna District, are set aside, as a result, the Petitioner is acquitted under Section 320(8) of ‘the Cr.P.C.’ There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 29.09.2026 VTS