Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12155 (GAU)

MAMONI KALITA ALIAS MAMONI DAS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./1977/2026 · 2026-08-11

Anjan Moni Kalita

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010147542026 2026:GAU-AS:11416 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1977/2026 MAMONI KALITA ALIAS MAMONI DAS W/O HITESH DAS R/O VILLAGE KULHATI KONADIA P.S. HAJO, DISTRICT KAMRUP, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S M ABDULLAH P, MR. A E HUSSAIN,MR. S HAQUE Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 12.08.2026 Heard Mr. S.M. Abdullah P, learned counsel for the accused/applicant. Also heard Mr. P.S. Lahkar, learned APP for the State. 2. This is an application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for granting of regular bail to the accused/ applicant in connection with Page No.# 2/3 Hajo P.S. Case No. 319/2026, registered under Sections 103(1) of the BNS, 2023. 3. The allegation as made in FIR dated 11.07.2026, is that the accused/ applicant is the sister-in-law of the informant and she after her marriage started subjecting mental and physical torture on the mother-in-law as well as on her. It was alleged that about 2 months ago accused/ applicant physically assaulted her husband Sri. Hitesh Das and the same was informed to the concerned police. It is alleged that despite this on the night of 10.07.2026, the accused/ applicant taking advantage of the absence of her husband stabbed her mother- in-law i.e., the informant’s mother on her neck with a sharp weapon causing her death. 4. On receipt of the FIR, police registered Hajo P.S. Case No. 319/2026 under the aforementioned section. 5. The learned counsel appearing for the accused/ applicant submits that the accused/ applicant is behind the bars for 32 days and the accused/ applicant is a lady and is willing to co-operate with the investigation. In view of the aforesaid, the accused/ applicant should be granted bail. 6. Case diary in the instant case has been received and the same is perused. 7. Mr. P.S. Lahkar, learned APP opposes the prayer for bail submitting that there are apparent materials against the accused/ applicant of her involvement in the crime. 8. This Court has considered the materials available in the case diary as well as the submissions made by the learned counsels for the respective parties and this Court is not inclined to grant any bail at this stage. Page No.# 3/3 9. Accordingly, the instant bail application is disposed of as rejected at this stage. 10. Case diary to be returned back. JUDGE Comparing Assistant