1 2026:CGHC:18074 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3444 of 2026 1 - Roshni Tirkey D/o- Shri Isdor Tirkey Aged About 36 Years Working As Tahsildar At Tahsil-Sanna District- Jaspur (C.G.) R/o- House No.05. Ward No.2 Aashma Delux Fuels Near Bajrang Fuels Mungeli Road Sakari Bilaspur (M.Corp), Post- Bilaspur Tahsil-Sakri, District-Bilaspur (C.G.) --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector, Jashpur District-Jashpur (C.G.) 3 - Sub Divisional Officer, (Revenue), Bagicha, District-Jashpur (C.G.) 4 - Committee Of Senior Secretaries Constituted For Redressal Of Grievance Relating To Transfer Case, Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District-Raipur (C.G) 5 - Rakesh Gupta S/o- Rajkumar Gupta Aged About 30 Years R/o- Sanna P.S. Sanna, District- Jashpur (C.G.) Block Development Counsel (B.D.C.) Of Sanna District -Jashpur (C.G.) --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Syed Ishhadil Ali, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Additional A.G. SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 21/04/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this petition seeking following relief (s) :- “10. This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authority to come with all the records in the present case. BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN 2 10.2 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to set-aside the impugned order dated 09.04.2026 (Annexure P-1), passed by respondent No.2 in the interest of justice. 10.3 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue any other order or orders, writ or writs, direction or directions as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner against the order of transfer (Annexure P-2) and order of reliving (Annexure P-1) had submitted representation before the respondent No.2, which is pending consideration, therefore, a direction be issued to respondent No.2 to consider and take decision on the representation at the earliest. 3. Learned State counsel submits that in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner seeking direction to respondent No.2 to take decision on the pending representation, he is having no objection. 4. On due consideration on the submission of learned counsel for respective parties, at this stage this petition is disposed of directing respondent No.2 to consider and take decision on the representation dated 10.04.2026 in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within further period of three weeks from the date of receipt of this order. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram