IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11900 of 2026 In Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.481 of 2024 ====================================================== Anil Kumar Singh @ Anil Singh S/O Late Dashrath Singh R/O Vill.- Jhawan, P.S.- Bihiya, Dist.- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BHOJPUR AT ARA BIHAR 2. THE SUPERINTEDENT OF POLICE, BHOJPUR AT ARA BIHAR 3. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, ARA, DISTRICT BHOJPUR. BIHAR 4. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, BIHIYA, DISTT.- BHOJPUR. BIHAR 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BIHIYA POLICE STATION. BIHAR 6. BINOD BIHARI SINGH S/O LATE VISHWANATH SINGH R/O VILLAGE- JHAWAN, P.S- BIHIYA, DISTT.- BHOJPUR. 7. CHHOTAK SINGH S/O LATE VISHWANATH SINGH R/O VILLAGE- JHAWAN, P.S- BIHIYA, DISTT.- BHOJPUR. 8. UDAY SHANKAR SINGH @ MUTTI SINGH S/O LATE VISHWANATH SINGH R/O VILLAGE- JHAWAN, P.S- BIHIYA, DISTT.- BHOJPUR. 9. RAJ BAHADUR SINGH S/O LATE VISHWANATH SINGH R/O VILLAGE- JHAWAN, P.S- BIHIYA, DISTT.- BHOJPUR. 10. BIHARI SINGH S/O LATE BAIJ NATH SINGH R/O VILLAGE- JHAWAN, P.S- BIHIYA, DISTT.- BHOJPUR. 11. RAM BADAN SINGH S/O LATE BAIJ NATH SINGH R/O VILLAGE- JHAWAN, P.S- BIHIYA, DISTT.- BHOJPUR. 12. RAVINDRA SINGH S/O LATE BAIJ NATH SINGH R/O VILLAGE- JHAWAN, P.S- BIHIYA, DISTT.- BHOJPUR. 13. SHEO NATH SINGH S/O LATE BAIJ NATH SINGH R/O VILLAGE- JHAWAN, P.S- BIHIYA, DISTT.- BHOJPUR. 14. NAGENDRA KUMAR SINGH S/O LATE SHEOJI SINGH R/O VILLAGE- JHAWAN, P.S- BIHIYA, DISTT.- BHOJPUR. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Pd. Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Rajeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Nirmala Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11900 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 2/2 2 23-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the prayer portion {2(a)}of the order dated 30.06.2025, the area of the land was wrongly been mentioned as 69 decimals whereas the area of the land is 1.38 acres which is apparent from the pleadings. 3. In these circumstances, the order dated 30.06.2025 is modified to the extent that the petitioner can file a representation with regard to area of the land as 1.38 acres. 4. Accordingly, the Modification application is allowed. Ranjeet/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T