Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12148 (RAJ)

MUKESH ROHILA S/O SANWARMAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8351/2026 · 2026-08-07

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:31093] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 8351/2026 CNR: RJHC020506442026 | URN: CRLMB / 15214U / 2026 Mukesh Rohila S/o Sanwarmal, Aged About 37 Years, R/o House No. 86, Near Durg, Panch Batti, Udaipurwati, Police Station Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, Presently R/o House No. 156A, Alkapuri, Niwaru Road, Jhotwara, Police Station Kardhani, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Kumar with Mr. Anurag Chahar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR (Through Video Conferencing) Order 07/08/2026 1. The instant second bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS by the accused-petitioner. The accused- petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 195/2025 registered at Police Station Vidhyadhar Nagar, District Jaipur City (North) for the offence punishable under Section 316(2) and 318(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner contends that the first bail application of the accused-petitioner was dismissed vide order dated 10.04.2026. Thereafter, out of the total 13 cited witnesses, 3 have been examined and the trial is likely to take considerable time to conclude. It is further contended that in other [2026:RJ-JP:31093] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8351/2026] cases of similar nature registered against the accused-petitioner, he has been enlarged on bail in 5 cases by this Court and in 4 other cases by the Trial Court/Sessions Court. It is also submitted that the accused-petitioner has remained in custody for almost one year. The matter is exclusively triable by the Magistrate and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take considerable time. Therefore, in view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is prayed that the second bail application of the accused-petitioner be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the long incarceration of the accused-petitioner and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, this Court deems it proper to allow the second bail application of the accused-petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the second Bail Application of the accused- petitioner is hereby allowed. The accused-petitioner Mukesh Rohila S/o Sanwarmal, shall be released on bail in pursuance of FIR No. 195/2025 registered at Police Station Vidhyadhar Nagar, District Jaipur City (North) on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- along with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/-each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Judge for his appearance before the Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so. The concerned Trial Judge shall verify the address and contact details of the sureties through concerned SHO before releasing the accused-petitioner on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:31093] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8351/2026] 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25 of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the trial court every month. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO and the concerned SHO shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the accused-petitioner changes his address or mobile number, he shall submit the same before the concerned SHO so also before the concerned learned trial court. 9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned SHO for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J 8/Devanshi Upadhyay