CRM-M-18848- IN THE H (227) ANIL STATE OF HAR CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. N *** MANISHA BATR 1. The Section 483 of Bh for grant of regul registered under S Nyaya Sanhita, 20 later on and Sect Juvenile Justice A Cantt. 2. The a recorded by the co he alongwith his Railway Station t -2026 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH Versus HARYANA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Kartar Singh, Advocate for the pe Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana *** BATRA, J. (ORAL) The instant petition has been prefe of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanh regular bail in case arising out of nder Sections 118(2), 127(4), 137(2) ita, 2023 (for short “BNS”) (Sections d Section 125 of BNS added later o tice Act at Police Station GRP Baha The aforementioned FIR was registe the complainant Bhim Lal Rishidev, a is two sons namely Santosh and ation to his village in District Kisha JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-18848-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 04.05.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent ANISHA BATRA r the petitioner preferred by the petitioner under a Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) ut of FIR No.18 dated 10.08.2025 137(2), 146, 289, 3(5) of Bharatiya ections 118(2), 3(5) of BNS deleted later on) and Section 75 and 79 of Bahadurgarh, District GRP ambala istered on the basis of statement idev, alleging that on 27/29.05.2025, and Kailash, was going from Jind Kishanganj, Bihar through Farkka 2026 oner dent nder SS”) 2025 atiya leted 9 of bala ment 025, Jind rkka AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.05 17:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-18848- Express train. Wh 08:15 PM, he alon and himself had c Santosh could not Station Bahadurga He did not registe alleged that on 29 qua the whereabou one arm of his s Rohtak. On askin name of Anil had on the fateful day. his cattle, cutting work and was not that on 27/28.07.2 made to forcibly treatment to him, road abutting some 3. After The petitioner wa his house after ki The petitioner was -2026 (O&M) 2 n. When the train reached at Railway e alongwith his sons had alighted at had come back to the Railway com ld not board the train. Later on his e adurgarh while making search for Sant register any FIR, but continued makin on 29.07.2025, on receipt of an info reabouts of his son Santosh, he had rea his son had been amputated. He n asking the victim Santosh, he disclo il had taken him to his house from the l day. The said Anil had involved him utting fodder and feeding the cattle. as not allowed to make any call to his 8.07.2025, the left hand of the Santosh cibly cut fodder with a fodder machi him, the above-said Anil and his fam g some forest area from where he had After registration of FIR, investigatio er was found to be the person who h fter kidnapping him and had made h er was arrested on 30.12.2025. Investi ailway Station Bahadurgarh at about ted at the platform. His son Kailash y compartment but his second son n his elder son had come at Railway r Santosh but he could not be found. making search at his own level. He n information from the Nuh Police had reached there and had found that He was got admitted at PGIMS, disclosed that one person with the om the Railway Station Bahadurgarh ed him in the work of taking care of attle. He was forced to do manual l to his family members. He alleged antosh was amputated while he was machine. Instead of providing any is family members had left him at a e had managed to reach Nuh. stigation proceedings were initiated. who had forcibly kept the victim in ade him do manual work forcibly. Investigation now stands concluded. bout ilash son lway . . He olice that IMS, h the rgarh re of nual eged was any at a d. m in ibly. AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.05 17:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-18848- 4. It is a falsely implicated for further invest employed by him had not been even name is Anil, he h not even lodged an of his version. Hi no chances of his deserves to be rele 5. Status keeping in view th not deserve to be chances of petition is, therefore, stress 6. This C for the parties at co 7. The p forcibly engaged h of his cattle etc. D elbow) of the vict amputation of hi -2026 (O&M) 3 It is argued by learned counsel for t icated in this case. He is in custody s investigation. He had never kidna y him as a labourer. His correct pare n even disclosed in the FIR and onl he has been falsely implicated in th ged any FIR qua disappearance of his n. His antecedents are clean. He has of his absconding. With these broad s be released on bail. Status report has been filed. Learne iew the gravity of the offences comm to be extended benefit of bail. It etitioner’s intimidating the witnesses, , stressed that the petition does not des This Court has heard the rival submis es at considerable length. The petitioner is alleged to have kid aged him in manual labour, including etc. During the course of such force e victim had been entangled in the fo of his upper limb and the petition l for the petitioner that he has been stody since long. He is not required kidnapped the victim nor he was ct parentage and the place of abode nd only because of the fact that his d in this case. The complainant had of his son and this proves the falsity e has a permanent abode. There are road submissions, it is urged that he earned State counsel has urged that committed by the petitioner, he does It is also argued that there are esses, if extended benefit of bail. It ot deserve to be allowed. ubmissions made by learned counsel ve kidnapped the minor victim and luding cutting fodder and taking care forced labour, the left hand, (upper the fodder machine resulting in the etitioner instead of providing any been uired was bode t his t had lsity e are at he that does are It unsel and care pper n the any AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.05 17:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-18848- treatment to the v become permanen during the course in nature. The c witnesses are yet allegations, the qu attendant facts an the petitioner does compelling ground 8. It is, be construed as an and shall not influ 9. Since any, is rendered in 04.05.2026 Amit Sharma -2026 (O&M) 4 the victim, had left him in a forest manently disabled. The petitioner wa ourse of investigation. The allegation The case is at its nascent stage. T re yet to be examined. Taking into co the quantum of sentence which the cts and circumstances, this Court is o er does not deserve to be released on ground to allow the petition, the same It is, however, clarified that the obse d as an expression of opinion of this C t influence the outcome of the trial in a Since the main petition has been dism ered infructuous. (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes Whether reportable:- Yes/No forest area. The minor victim has er was duly identified by the victim gations against him are quite serious ge. The victim and other material into consideration the gravity of the h the conviction may entail and the rt is of the considered opinion that ed on bail. Accordingly, finding no same is dismissed. e observations made above shall not this Court on the merits of the case ial in any manner.
dismissed, pending application, if (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No has ictim rious terial f the d the that g no l not case n, if AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.05 17:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.