Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12144 (CHH)

RAMAKANT DHIVAR v. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA

WPC/1011/2026 · 2026-03-09

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:11519 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1011 of 2026 Ramakant Dhivar S/o Balram Dhivar Aged About 32 Years R/o Ward No. 10, Sadak Para Village- Nariyara, P.S. Mulmula District- Janjgir Champa (Cg) --- Petitioner versus 1 - Reserve Bank Of India Through Its Governor, Having Its Head Office At New Central Office Building, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Road, Fort, Mumbai (Maharashtra) 2 - Punjab National Bank (Pnb) Through The Branch Manager Nariyara, Near Brin- davan Petrol Pump Nariyara District Janjgir- Champa (Cg) 3 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Police (Home) Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Atal Nagar, Raipur District Raipur (Cg) 4 - The Director General Of Police Department Of Home Affairs, (Police) Head Quarter Sector-19 Nava Raipur District Raipur (Cg) 5 - Superintendent Of Police Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh 6 - Cyber Cell Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh 7 - State Of Rajasthan Through Cyber Police Station Kota City Rajasthan AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Digitally signed by AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Date: 2026.03.11 17:18:43 +0530 2 8 - State Of Maharashtra Through Cyber Police Station Central Region Brihan Mumbai City Maharashtra 9 - State Of Karnataka Through North Cen Crime Ps Bangalore City Karnataka 10 - Cen Crime Ps, Davanagere, Karnataka --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Rohan Sharma, Adv. For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. P.R. Patankar, Adv. For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Sudhanshu Upadhyay, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Sharad Mishra, Adv. For Respondents No. 3 to 7 Mr. Anand Dadariya, Dy. Adv. General Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order On Board 10-3-2026 1 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and this petition has become infructuous. 2 In view of above submission, this writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. 3 Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge pathak