Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12134 (CHH)

RAJBHAN YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/851/2026 · 2026-02-05

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:6828 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 851 of 2026 1 - Rajbhan Yadav S/o Gopi Yadav Aged About 37 Years R/o- Village Deogarh, Bharatpur, District- Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur, Distirct Manendragarh-Chirmiri- Bharatpur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Tehsildar Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur, District Manendragarh-Chirmiri- Bharatpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Gram Panchayat, Deogarh Through Sarpanch, Bharatpur, Manendragarh- Chirmiri-Bharatpur, District Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Pushparaj Mourya S/o Late Swamidin Mourya R/o- Village Janua, Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur, District Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Shankar Mishra, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sahdev Yadav, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Kalpesh Ruparel, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 06 /02/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- 2 “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly call for records pertaining to service of petitioner, in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside the impugned orders dated 13.10.2025 and 15.10.2025, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the Respondent/State raises an objection with regard to maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that the petitioner is having the alternate efficacious remedy of appeal under Section 44 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959. 3. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition at this stage with liberty to avail the other remedy available under the law. 4. On due consideration of the submission of counsel for the respective parties, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage, reserving liberty with the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy available under law. 5. Office is directed to return back certified copies of the documents enclosed along with the writ petition, after retaining photocopies of the same. 6. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY Date: 2026.02.07 12:17:20 +0530