Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:13544
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (Cr.) No. 28 of 2024
---- Kusum Minz
… … Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. The Director General of Police, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.
3. The Superintendent of Police, Ranchi.
4. The Officer-in-charge, Lalpur, District Ranchi.
5. Anita Tirky
… Respondents
------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
-------
For the Petitioner : None
For the State
: AC to A.A.G.-III
For the Resp.No.5 : Mr. Binod Kr. Singh, Advocate
Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate
-------
17/06.05.2026
None appears on behalf of the petitioner, though learned AC to A.A.G.-III and Mr. Binod Kr. Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.5 are present.
In this writ application, the petitioner has prayed for a direction upon the respondents to proceed with the investigation in connection with Lalpur P.S. Case No.120/2023.
Learned A.C. to A.A.G.-III, on instruction, has submitted a copy of the communication dated 23.04.2026 from which it appears that due to insufficiency of evidence, final form has been submitted by the Police.
In view of the submission of final form, the prayer made by the writ petitioner in this writ application cannot be acceded to and consequently the same stands disposed of.
Let a copy of the instruction submitted at the Bar be kept on record.
Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stand(s) closed.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Shamim/- Uploaded on: 08/05/2026