Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12130 (ALL)

MANISH SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

CRLR/6229/2026 · 2026-10-06

Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar J Criminal

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 6229 of 2026 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J. 1. Heard Sri Sudhir Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the revisionist, and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the present criminal revision has been filed seeking relief as mentioned in the prayer clause. The prayer clause is delineated below:- "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow the Revision to set aside the impugned judgment and order dated 04.08.2026 passed by Additional District and Session Judge I Ballia in Criminal Appeal No. 16 of 2026 (Manish Singh Versus State of U.P. and another) under section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 as well as the order dated 6.1.2026 passed by Civil Judge ( J .D.)/F.T.C. III Ballia in Case No.1741 of 2024 (Seema Singh Versus Manish Singh and others) under section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005. And/or pass such other and further order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case, otherwise revisionist suffer an irreparable loss and injury." 3. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that he does not want to press the present revision at this stage and submits that the revisionist may be provided an opportunity of hearing by the learned Trial Court while finally deciding the proceedings pending under Section 12 of the Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Krishna Kumar Mishra, Sudhir Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Manish Singh .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for short, the Act, 2005). He further submits that the said proceedings may be directed to be decided within a period of six months, without granting any unnecessary adjournments. 4. In view of the above submission, the learned Trial Court is directed to decide the pending proceedings under Section 12 of the Act, 2005, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months, after providing adequate opportunity of hearing to the parties and without granting any unnecessary adjournments.. 5. With the above direction, this criminal revision is disposed of. October 7, 2026 DKS CRLR No. 6229 of 2026 2 (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR SRIVASTWA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad