Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
20.03.2026 Item No.13 Ct. No.1 PG C.P.A.N. 1868 of 2005
Arabinda Halder Vs. Narayan Naskar
DICTATED BY SUJOY PAUL, CJ.:
1. None appears for the parties even in the pass over round.
2. It appears that matter has either rendered infructuous or parties have lost interest in the matter.
3. The contempt petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(SUJOY PAUL, CJ.) (PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J.)