Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12128 (BOM)

SUNITA SATISH PANDITA v. SATISH MAHESHWARNATH PANDITA

WP/11361/2025 · 2026-09-24

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

7-WP-11361-2025 (C).doc S.S.Kilaje IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11361 OF 2025 Sunita Satish Pandita ...Petitioner VERSUS Satish Maheshwarnath Pandita ...Respondent _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Aneesh Deshpande a/w Mr. Shailendra Gaikwad, Advocate for Petitioner. None for Respondent. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 24th SEPTEMBER, 2026. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions seeks leave to withdraw this Petition. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is staying in flat at Thane. The direction be given to the petitioner not to evict the petitioner from staying in the said flat and pay EMI regularly. 4. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, petition is allowed to be withdrawn. 5. Dismissed and disposed of. 6. All pending applications, if any, also disposed of. 7. The respondent shall not evict the petitioner from the flat in SONALI SATISH KILAJE Digitally signed by SONALI SATISH KILAJE Date: 2026.09.29 16:05:38 +0530 7-WP-11361-2025 (C).doc S.S.Kilaje which she staying without proper procedure and respondent shall pay EMI of the said flat. The respondent shall not create third party right in the flat where petitioner and daughter stays. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)