YASH ARUN CHOUGULE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
BA/362/2026 · 2026-09-28
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12120 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12120 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1/3 38-BA-362-2026 (CR).DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 362 OF 2026 Yash Arun Chougule …...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr. …...Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Pratik G. Tare i/b Mr. Sachin Y. Mane, for Applicant. Dr. Ashvini A. Takalkar, A.P.P., for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 - State. PSI, Mr. Govinda Natha Kolekar, Ichalkaranji Police Station, present. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 28th SEPTEMBER, 2026. P.C.
1. Heard Mr. Pratik G. Tare, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Dr. Ashvini A. Takalkar, learned A.P.P. for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – State. 2. By the present Application, the Applicant has sought the following substantial relief:
“a) That the Applicant be enlarged on bail with C.R. No.15 of 2025 registered with Ichalkaranji Police Station for offences punishable under Section 103(1) r/w 3(5) of the BNS.” Shantanu S. Dhudum SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Digitally signed by SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Date: 2026.09.28 21:04:36 +0530
2/3 38-BA-362-2026 (CR).DOC
3. Dr. Ashvini A. Takalkar, learned A.P.P. for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – State, refers to the order dated 24th September 2025 passed by this Court in Criminal Bail Application No.3338 of 2025 (Exhibit C, page No.124). She submits that, in the event the Applicant intends to renew the request for bail in terms of the liberty granted by this Court, the same will have to be renewed before the Trial Court at the first instance. 4. Faced with the said objection, Mr. Pratik G. Tare, learned Advocate for the Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the present Bail Application with liberty to approach the Trial Court with a fresh Bail Application in terms of the liberty granted by this Court vide order dated 24th September 2025 passed in Criminal Bail Application No.3338 of
2025. 5. This request is not opposed by Dr. Ashvini A. Takalkar, learned A.P.P. for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – State. 6. In view of the statement made by Mr. Pratik G. Tare, learned Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw this Bail Application to approach the Trial Court in terms of the liberty granted by this Court vide order dated 24th September 2025. 7. If a fresh Bail Application is filed before the Trial Court, the same be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law. Shantanu S. Dhudum
3/3 38-BA-362-2026 (CR).DOC
8.
Criminal Bail Application No.362 of 2026 is disposed of as withdrawn. ( ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum