APHC010497692026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE 28th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2691/2026 Between: 1. KANDIKATTU MALLIKARJUNA, ,S/O. LATE MARUTHI PRASAD,AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, BUSINESS,R/O. D.NO.16/2224, ACHARI STREET,NELLORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,SPS NELLORE DISTRICT, AP. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SANGEETHA DILEEP KUMAR, , W/O.DILIP KUMAR,AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.16-1-557,MUNGAMURIVARI STREET, NELLORE CITY, S.P.S NELLORE DISTRICT,A.P., CELL- 9849273165. 2. SIDDANTH JAIN, , S/O. DILIP KUMAR,AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.16-1-557,MUNGAMURIVARI STREET, NELLORE CITY,S.P.S NELLORE DISTRICT, A.P. CELL- 9849273165. 3. KOMMURU VENKATESWARLU, ,S/O. LATE NAGISETTY,AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, BUSINESS,R/O.17/33, RAYAJI STREET, NELLORE CITY,MOBILE NO.94944 20783 4. PATHRI RAVI CHANDRA, , S/O LATE SESHADRI RAOHINDU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, EMPLOYEER/O 5/15, RANGASWAMY NAGAR, KOVAIPUDUR,COIMBATORE, TAMILNADU. 5. KALYANAM INDIRA LAKSHMI, W/O K.V.S. CHALAPATHY RAOHINDU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS. HOUSE WIFE,R/O D.NO.19-7- 109-A/6, GOPALARAJU COLONY,TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT (RESPONDENT NO.4 AND 5 ARE NOT NECESSARY PARTIES) ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toThe present civil revision petition is being filed aggrieved by not disposing of interlocutory application in I.A.N0.559 of 2022 IN O.S.N0.718 OF 2020 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nellore. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C SUBODH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: ORDER The 3rd plaintiff in the suit filed the above revision, complaining of non- disposal of the I.A.No.559 of 2022 in O.S.No.718 of 2020 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Nellore. 2. Given the prayer in the revision, notice in respect of the respondents 1 to 3 is dispensed with. 3. The petitioner, along with 2 others, filed suit O.S.No.718 of 2020, against the respondents 1 to 3 to declare that the sale deeds in favour of defendants 2 to 4 are null and void and not binding on the plaintiffs and for grant of perpetual injunction. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that pending the suit, the plaintiffs filed I.A.No.559 of 2022 under Section 94(e) and 151 and Order XXVI Rules 9 & 10 of CPC, to appoint an advocate commissioner to localise the suit schedule property. The 3rd respondent filed a counter on 01.03.2023, and till date, the said I.A. has not been disposed of. He would submit that the suit has ripened for trial. 5. Given the facts and circumstances, without going into the merits of the matter, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of, directing the learned Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Nellore, to dispose of I.A.No.559 of 2022 in O.S.No.718 of 2020 on its file, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI PVD