ROHAN SINGH @ RATANJEET PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/24429/2026 · 2026-10-06
Padam Narain Mishra, Salil Kumar Rai
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12119 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12119 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 24429 of 2026 Court No. - 45 HON'BLE SALIL KUMAR RAI, J.
HON'BLE PADAM NARAIN MISHRA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA for the State-respondent nos. 1, 2 & 3.
2. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the FIR dated 23.09.2026, registered as Case Crime No. 0500 of 2026, under Sections 108, 351(3) of B.N.S., Police Station Hata, District Kushinagar.
3. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the recitals in the First Information Report do not disclose any offence committed by the petitioners specially the offence under Sections 108 and 351(3) of BNS. It was further argued that the First Information Report is liable to be quashed by this Court.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the present petition.
5. In view of the order proposed to be passed, it would serve no useful purpose by issuing notice to respondent no. 4 and calling for a counter affidavit.
6. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case and after considering the arguments of the counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioners shall not be arrested in pursuance of the First Information Report dated 23.09.2026, registered as Case Crime No. 0500 of 2026, under Sections 108, 351(3) of B.N.S., Police Station Hata, District Kushinagar, till submission of the police report/charge-sheet under Section 193 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditya Kumar Tripathi, Amresh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Rohan Singh @ Ratanjeet Pratap Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
2023.
7. However, it is clarified that the interim protection granted to the petitioners shall not prohibit the concerned Investigating Machinery to investigate any case regarding indulgence of the petitioners in any business relating to circulation of fake currency. If any evidence regarding the said offence is found, the said interim protection shall not be applicable and in such a situation, the police shall proceed in accordance with law. October 7, 2026 Rama Kant CRLP No. 24429 of 2026 2 (Padam Narain Mishra,J.) (Salil Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMA KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad