- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20784 RFA No. 548 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 548 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. NARAYANI @ NARAYANA S/O LATE CHANNAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST 2. SMT. DEEPA W/O LATE MAHESH, D/O LATE JAYARAM, GRAND DAUGHTER OF CHANNAIAH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST BOTH RESIDING AT BOVI COLONY, ANTHARA GANGE, BHADRAVATHI TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DIST. PIN CODE-577301 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. PRAKASH H.N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. SUMITRA HIRE GOWDA W/O HIRE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O 3RD CROSS, SIDDARUDANAGAR BHADRAVATHI TALUK SHIVAMOGA DISTRICT, PIN-577301 2. SMT. RATHNAMMA W/O. JAYARAM AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20784 RFA No. 548 of 2025 3. SRI. DILIP J., S/O. JAYARAM AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, 4. SRI. SUDEEP J. @ SANDEEP J. S/O JAYARAM AGED ABOUT 33 RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 4 R/T ANTHARAGANGE VILLAGE KUDLAGIRI HOBLI, BHADRAVATHI TALUK SHIVAMOGA DISTRICT, PIN-577301 5. SRI. ANIL KUMAR S/O NARAYANA, GRANDSON OF CHANNAIAH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST 6. SRI. SUNIL KUMAR S/O NARAYANA, GRANDSON OF CHANNAIAH AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST BOTH R-4 AND R-5 ARE RESIDING AT BOVI COLONY, ANTHARA GANGE, BHADRAVATHI TALUK, SHIVAMOGA DISTRICT, PIN-577301 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.S. VENKATESH, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; NOTICE SERVED ON RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 6 AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 10.12.2024 PASSED ON EX.NO.71/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE BHADRAVATHI, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20784 RFA No. 548 of 2025 REJECTING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 47 R/W ORDER 21 RULE 97 OF CPC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal. 2. The memo is taken on record. In view of the memo, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8