Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12109 (MAD)

M.Pachamuthu v. State rep.by

CRL OP/5709/2026 · 2026-03-05

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 5709 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 5709 of 2026 M.Pachamuthu S/o.Murugan, Manga Maram Street, Natupattu, Tiruvannamalai District-606808. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State represented by: The Sub Inspector of Police, Veraiyur Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. Cr.No.15 of 2026. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No.15 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): M/s.P.Sridhar For Respondent(s): Mr. S. Vinoth Kumar, Government Advocate (Criminal side). ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 17.02.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 109 and 351(3) of B.N.S. in Crime No.15 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 5709 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 17.02.2026, the petitioner abused the defacto complainant in filthy language, assaulted him using knife and criminally intimidated him with dire consequences Hence, this case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Therefore, he prays to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 4. Whereas the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent police strongly opposed to enlarge the petitioner on bail on the ground that the petitioner stabbed the victim, due to which, he sustained grievous injury and therefore, if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, there is every possibility for tampering of witnesses. He further submitted the photographs of the injured. 5. While looking at the photographs of the injured, the severity of the injury sustained by the victim is visible. In such view of the grievous injury sustained by the victim, considering the gravity of the allegations against this petitioner and considering the objection made by the learned Government Advocate, this Court is of the opinion that it is not desirable to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this point of time. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 5709 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 05-03-2026 MJS Note: 1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To 1. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. 2. The Sub Inspector of Police, Veraiyur Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 5709 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. MJS CRL OP No. 5709 of 2026 05-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis