Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010144472026 2026:GAU-AS:11555 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2127/2026 ABDUL MINTU ALIAS MINTU ALI S/O- ABDUL RAHIM R/O- CHAWALKHUWA GHORBANDI CHUK P.S.-DIBRUGARH DIST- DIBRUGARH ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE P.P. ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR S M ABDULLAH P Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 14.08.2026 Heard Mr. S.M. Abdullah P, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M. P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Page No.# 2/3 Assam. 2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 for release on bail of the accused/petitioner who was arrested on 21.07.2026 in connection with Dibrugarh P.S. Case No. 189/2025 registered under Sections 118(2)/189(2) of BNS, 2023. 3. The informant Reshma Begum lodged an FIR on 21.05.2025 alleging inter alia that the petitioner along with some others had intercepted the husband of the petitioner while he was going on a morning walk and took him to the residence of the petitioner and assaulted him with dangerous weapons and caused grievous injuries to his head, hand and leg. However, the police arrived and rescued the husband of the informant. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits the allegations made in the FIR are false and the FIR has been lodged in order to keep the petitioner in jail as there is a long history of enmity between the families of the informant side and the petitioner side. In this regard, learned counsel has referred to several other cases pending against the petitioner. 5. The learned Addl. Public Prosecutor has produced the Case Diary along with injury report. 6. On perusal of the injury report, it is seen that no such grievous injury as alleged is indicated and the injured was discharged against medical advice. Page No.# 3/3 7. Having regard to the above, the prayer for bail is allowed. 8. Accordingly, the petitioner in connection with the aforesaid case is directed to be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two (2) sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. It is further provided that the petitioner shall not try to intimidate or contact the family members of the informant side. 9. The petition is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant