1 2026:CGHC:9521 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 822 of 2026 Shrawan Kumar S/o Trinath Kumar Aged About 38 Years R/o New Kaling Nagar, Near Miraj Petrol Pump, Gudhiyari, Police Station Gudhiyari, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) (Cause Title Of The Applicant As Per Charge Sheet) .. Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House OfÏcer, Through Police Station Civil Line, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Non-applicant(s) For Applicant : Mr. Shivendu Pandya, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Saumya Rai, Dy. G.A. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 24.02.2026 1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 44/2025, registered at Police Station : Civil Lines, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 111, 3(5), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. 2. The case of the prosecution, in a nutshell, is that the Government of KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 India has established the Cyber Crime Reporting Portal and the 1930 Helpline Number for the prevention of cyber offences, through which victims can report incidents of cyber fraud. On the basis of information received through the said system, it came to light that a total of 104 bank accounts were opened in Utkarsh Small Finance Bank, Civil Line Branch, Raipur (IFSC Code: UTKS0001400), which were allegedly being used for receiving proceeds of cyber fraud. On the basis of the said information and as per the directions issued by the Police Headquarters, Crime No. 44/2025 under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 111 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita was registered at Police Station Civil Line, District Raipur (C.G.) against the said account holders. It is alleged against the present applicant that he is also one of the account holders and assisted the other accused persons in committing the offence and in transferring the amounts obtained through cyber fraud to other bank accounts. It is further alleged that as per the Cyber Crime Coordination Centre portal, a total amount of Rs.36,48,448/- was found to be involved in illegal transactions through the aforesaid mule account. On the basis of the said information, Police Station Civil Line, District Raipur (C.G.) registered the FIR against the present applicant along with other co-accused persons, alleging that the applicant, in connivance with other co-accused persons, committed the offence of cheating by way of illegal financial transactions through bank accounts. Accordingly, an offence punishable under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 111 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita has been registered against the 3 present applicant along with other co-accused persons. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. It is further submitted that a similarly situated co-accused, namely Harmeet Singh @ Yashmit, has already been enlarged on bail by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 15006/2025 vide order dated 19.11.2025 and further the fact that similarly situated co-accused namely Om Arya has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 27.11.2025 in MCRC No. 9388/2025. In view of the principle of parity, learned counsel prays that the applicant may also be enlarged on bail. 4. On the other hand, learned State Counsel, appearing for the State/non-applicant, submit that the charge-sheet has been filed before the competent Court and the trial is currently in progress. He further concur with the submission made on behalf of the applicants to the effect that the principle of parity may be considered, however, he contend that the serious nature of the offences, the ongoing investigation and the possibility of influencing witnesses weigh against granting bail to the applicant at this stage. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case- diary. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegations levelled against the applicant and the fact that a similarly situated co-accused, namely Harmeet Singh @ Yashmit, has already been enlarged on bail by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 15006/2025 4 vide order dated 19.11.2025 and further the fact that similarly situated co-accused namely Om Arya has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 27.11.2025 in MCRC No. 9388/2025 and further in the present case, charge-sheet has been filed before the competent Court therefore, without further commenting anything on merits, I am inclined to grant bail to the present applicant on parity. 7. Accordingly, the bail application of the applicant is allowed. 8. Let applicant, Shrawan Kumar, involved in Crime No. 44/2025, registered at Police Station : Civil Lines, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 111, 3(5), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufÏcient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 5 (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufÏcient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 9. OfÏce is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal