IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12386 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-223 Year-2022 Thana- ROSERA District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1. Binod Singh @ Binod Kumar Singh S/o Late Ganga Singh R/o Village- Muradpur, PS- Rosera, Distt- Samastipur 2. Manoj Singh @ Manoj Kumar Singh S/o Late Ganga Singh R/o Village- Muradpur, PS- Rosera, Distt- Samastipur 3. Pramod Singh @ Pramod Kumar Singh S/o Late Gango Singh R/o Village- Muradpur, PS- Rosera, Distt- Samastipur 4. Prince Kumar Singh @ Prince Kumar S/o Manoj Singh R/o Village- Muradpur, PS- Rosera, Distt- Samastipur 5. Raja Singh S/o Manoj Singh R/o Village- Muradpur, PS- Rosera, Distt- Samastipur 6. Prashant Kumar Singh @ Prashant Kumar S/o Binod Singh R/o Village- Muradpur, PS- Rosera, Distt- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Prabhat For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 25-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application as against petitioner no. 3, against whom the allegation of assaulting the informant is levelled. 3. Permission is granted. 4. Accordingly, the instant application as against the petitioner no.3 is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Now, the anticipatory bail application is being Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12386 of 2026(2) dt.25-02-2026 2/4 heard only with respect to the petitioner nos.1, 2, 4, 5 and 6. 6. The petitioners apprehends their arrest in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No.223 of 2022, Samastipur registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 7. As per the FIR, the petitioners and other co- accused persons brutally assaulted the informant’s side by means of several weapons. 8. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegations of overt acts are not specific and that the injuries said to have been sustained by the injured persons are simple in nature. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners undertake not to indulge in similar offences in future. In case the allegations are found to be true against them upon investigation, the police may be given liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail. Lastly, it is submitted that petitioner nos. 1 and 2 have one criminal antecedent each, whereas petitioner nos. 4, 5 and 6 have no criminal antecedents. 9. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners. 10. Considering the facts and circumstances of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12386 of 2026(2) dt.25-02-2026 3/4 case, let the above named petitioner nos.1, 2, 4, 5 and 6, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- 1st, Rosera, Samastipur/Successor Court in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No.223 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS as well as the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors should be the family member/relative/ known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document/ personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide; (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her/their bail bond by the Trial Court itself; (iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds; (iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12386 of 2026(2) dt.25-02-2026 4/4 any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. 11. Accordingly, this application is partly allowed. shikha/- (Ajit Kumar, J) U T