Cherukuri Mutually aided co-operative credit society Ltd v. State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/13351/2016 · 2026-09-29
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12102 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12102 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010174332016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 13351 OF 2016 Between:
1. Cherukuri Mutually aided co-operative credit society Ltd,, H.O: Plot no 29, Phase 1, Vanasthalipuram, Hyd-70 rep. by its President Mr. C Gopinath ...Petitioner AND
1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By Principal Secretary, Energy Dept Andhra Pradesh Secretariat, Hyderabad
2. Vidyut Ombudsman Andhra Pradesh, Flat No. 401, Ashoka Chambers Adarsh Nagar, Opp: MLA Quarters, Hyderabad 500 063.
3. The Secretary, Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, 11-4- 660, 4th Floor, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad 500004
4. The Chairman, C.G.R.F, APSPDCL, 19/13/65/A, Sreenivasapuram, Near 132 KV Sub Station, Tiruchanoor Road, Tirupati 517503.
5. The Divisional Engineer, Operation, APSPDCL, Town -1, Nalla Cheruvu Zero line, Guntur District 522004.
6. The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Opertion, APSPDCL, Town -1, Opp. Liberty Theatre, Guntur Dist - 522001
7. The Assistant Engineer, Operation, APSPDCL, D, Town -1, Guntur -
522002.
...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or Direction preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to the 2nd Respondent and set aside by dedaring the Appeal No.16 of 2015 dated 09.03.2016 on the file of rd Respondent as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 16691 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Appeal No.16 of 2015 dated 09.03.2016 on the file of the 2nd Respondent, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: CH V PRASAD BABU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENERGY (TG) Counsel for the Respondents:JAGARLAMUDIKOTESWARIDEVI(SC FORAPSPDCL) Counsel for the Respondents:V V SATISH The Court made the following order:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 13351 OF 2016
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the docket order reveals that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last occasion i.e., on 25.09.2026. Therefore, on 25.09.2026, the matter is
directed to be listed on 30.09.2026 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today also there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the case.
2. Since the petitioner is not evincing any interest to prosecute the matter, the present writ petition is liable to be dismissed for non- prosecution.
3. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
__________________________________
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 30.09.2026 BSP/DS
37 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 13351 OF 2016
30.09.2026 BSP/DS